The problems you know
Eng is a bottleneck
Every landing page request becomes a ticket. By the time it ships, the campaign has moved on. You need to control the page yourself.
CMS templates feel canned
WordPress and HubSpot landing pages all look the same. Your campaigns deserve specific design, not a global template.
Tracking always breaks
Hand-built pages lack proper UTM handling, conversion tracking, structured data. Every campaign reinvents the wheel.
Tests take weeks
A/B test variants need eng to deploy. By the time the variant ships, the test window is gone.
How InBuild solves them
From prompt to live page in 30 seconds
Describe the campaign. AI generates a full landing page — hero, social proof, features, FAQ, CTA. Edit in the visual editor, publish, share the link.
Variants in a few clicks
Duplicate a page, regenerate just the hero with a different angle, publish at `/p/[id]/v2`. A/B test with your existing tool (PostHog, Optimizely).
Proper SEO + tracking out of the box
Every page emits metadata, structured data, OG images. UTM-friendly query parsing. Form submissions hit your Forms dashboard with full attribution.
Export when you need custom
When you need to do something AI doesn't generate, export the Next.js code and hand it to engineering. No vendor lock-in.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use this without engineering involved?
Yes — that's the design center. Marketing builds in InBuild; eng gets involved when the campaign needs custom backend (gated content, complex tracking, multi-step flows that exceed our form builder).
How does this integrate with my marketing stack?
Form submissions to your Forms dashboard with CSV export → import to HubSpot/Mailchimp/Salesforce. Analytics: drop your GA/Plausible/PostHog snippet in the page head via the Design panel. UTMs work natively.
What about brand consistency across campaigns?
Set theme colors and fonts once at the project level — every page in that project inherits the brand. For multi-brand agencies, one InBuild project per brand.